Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals || Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment || Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society || SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers || J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated || Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour || Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases || Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act || MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments || J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution

Bikram’s Yoga College of India, L.P. and Bikram Choudhury v. Evolation Yoga, LLC and others - (08 Oct 2015)

US Court of Appeal holds sequence of yoga poses not copyrightable

Intellectual Property Rights

A Court of Appeal in the United States of America ruled that the sequence used in ‘hot yoga’ classes was a process intended to improve people's health, and wasn’t covered under copyright. Hot yoga is performed in a room heated to about 105 degrees (that’s Fahrenheit, or as most Indians know it, summertime) and includes 26 postures and two breathing exercises performed for 90 minutes. Dismissing the appeal for many reasons, the Court held the “particularly beautiful and graceful” postures could not be classified as choreographic work and were excluded under Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act, 1976.

Tags : COPYRIGHT YOGA HOT CHOREOGRAPHIC

Share :