Supreme Court: State Must Be Impleaded When Relief is Sought From Public Exchequer  ||  SC: Student Fees Cannot Be Increased Mid-Course Except in Exceptional Circumstances  ||  Supreme Court: ED's Delay in Sending Arrest Order Does Not By Itself Invalidate Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Appeal Limitation Runs From NCLAT Order Pronouncement, Not Certified Copy Receipt  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Tribunal Has No Supervisory Authority Over Waqf Board  ||  Kerala High Court Orders Aadhaar Fingerprint Comparison to Trace Sreekrishnapuram Murder Culprits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unnatural Death at Police Station Alone Cannot Establish Police Negligence  ||  Orissa High Court: Teacher Scolding Student for Intoxicant Use is Not Suicide Abetment  ||  Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights    

Supreme Court allows passive euthanasia, issues guidelines - (09 Mar 2018)

Constitution

The Supreme Court while holding that right to live with dignity is a fundamental right has allowed passive euthanasia for terminally-ill patients. The landmark ruling is given by five-member Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India. Supreme Court in a historic judgment held that, right to life and liberty as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is meaningless unless it encompasses within its sphere individual dignity. Supreme Court recognized that, fundamental right includes right to die with dignity.

An adult person can make an advance ‘living will’ authorising the withdrawal of life-support system. The spectrum of Article 21 of Constitution has been widened to include within it the right to live with dignity as component of right to life and liberty. The right to live with dignity also includes the smoothening of the process of dying in case of a terminally ill patient or a person in PVS with no hope of recovery. Supreme Court said that, a failure to legally recognize advance medical directives may amount to non-facilitation of the right to smoothen the dying process and the right to live with dignity.

The Supreme Court has issued detailed guidelines to be followed. The constitutionally recognised right to life is subject to the procedure established by law. Criminal law imposes restraints and penal exactions which regulate the deprivation of life, or as the case may be, personal liberty. The intentional taking away of the life of another is made culpable by the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Active euthanasia falls within the express prohibitions of the law and is unlawful. The decision by a treating doctor to withhold or withdraw medical intervention in the case of a patient in the terminal stage of illness or in a persistently vegetative state or the like where artificial intervention will merely prolong the suffering and agony of the patient is protected by the law. Where the doctor has acted in such a case in the best interest of the patient and in bona fide discharge of the duty of care, the law will protect the reasonable exercise of a professional decision.

Tags : ILLNESS   PASSIVE EUTHANASIA   FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved