Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause || SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended || SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders || SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity || SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity || Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts || J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice || Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted || Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home || Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing

OECD global reforms to curb tax avoidance by MNCs - (06 Oct 2015)

The OECD’s tax reforms, ‘Base Erosion and Profit Shifting’, to help close loopholes that allow companies avoid tax by moving profits to low-tax jurisdictions invited much opprobrium. Among the new rules proposed, is one requiring companies provide a complete break-up of information about every tax regime in which they operate, account for profits in each country and detail how much tax it has paid. OECD estimates place the amount of tax avoided by multi-national companies from such inter-jurisdictional transfer of profits, enabled by ‘treaty shopping’ between US$100 billion and US$240 billion.

Relevant : Read more about BEPS at oecd.org/ctp/beps-about.htm/

Tags : OECD TAX MULTI NATIONAL TREATY SHOPPING

Share :