Gauhati HC: DRT Has to Dispose of Application under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act as per RDB Act  ||  Kerala HC: Showing or Waving Black Flag to a Person Cannot Amount to Defamation  ||  Del. HC: Merit Based Review of Arb. Award Involving Reappraisal of Factual Findings is Impermissible  ||  Del. HC: It is the Product and Not the Technology Used that Determines HSN Classification  ||  P&H HC: Provis. of Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen (First Amendment) Rules are Unconstitutional  ||  Cal HC: High Time that Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage be Read as Grounds of Desertion & Cruelty  ||  Supreme Court: Third Party Can File SLP Against Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Absolute Ownership in Property as Per HSA Can’t be Claimed by Woman with Limited Interest  ||  SC: Can’t Forego Fundamental Requirements of Election of Society in Absence of Specific Provisions  ||  SC: Special Efforts Should be Made to Identify Women Prisoners Eligible for Release u/s 479 of BNSS    

Salvatore valerio v. The state of western australia - (09 Jan 2018)

Bail can only be granted where exceptional circumstances are demonstrated and it is otherwise appropriate to do so

Criminal

In instant case, Mr Valerio's application filed for bail pending his appeal against conviction. Alternatively, the Appellant seeks an urgent appeal order. The Appellant was convicted after trial in the District Court of one count of aggravated manufacture of a prohibited drug, namely DMT. He was sentenced to 3 years 4 months' immediate imprisonment with eligibility for parole. On 11 September 2017, present Court refused leave to appeal against that sentence.

The appeal against conviction relies on three grounds. Ground 1 alleges that, the trial judge erred in dismissing an application made in the trial that there was no case to answer. Ground 2 alleges that, the verdict of guilty was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence. Ground 3 alleges that, additional evidence demonstrates that there has been a miscarriage of justice.

The law with respect to bail pending appeal is well-settled and does not need to be repeated here. Bail can only be granted where exceptional circumstances are demonstrated and it is otherwise appropriate to do so. A grant of bail is generally inappropriate where the appellant fails to demonstrate that one or more of the grounds of appeal have a strong prospect of success.

It is sufficient to say that, at the moment, it has not been demonstrated that, any of the proposed grounds have a strong prospect of success. This preliminary view may change after a full hearing of the appeal. The Appellant has proffered other reasons why he should be granted bail, being that he has been in custody now for a long period of time and that he is a party in contentious family law proceedings. These matters are not, by themselves or in combination, sufficient to justify a grant of bail. Exceptional reasons for a grant of bail pending appeal have not been demonstrated. Accordingly, Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to grant bail and the application is dismissed.

Tags : BAIL   GRANT   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved