Delhi HC: Disclosure of Company Disputes to Concerned Party Doesn’t Amount to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Dealings in Other Properties Don’t Affect Right to Evict for Bonafide Need  ||  Supreme Court: No Exclusive Quota for Advocates in District Judge Direct Recruitment  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Education Must Start Early, Not Just From Classes IX to XII  ||  Supreme Court: Delay in Filing Written Statement During COVID Limitation Extension Allowed  ||  Supreme Court: Fake Driver’s License Doesn’t Free Insurer Unless Owner Allowed Violation  ||  Supreme Court: Railway Accident Claims Aren’t Criminal Trials; No Need for Strict Proof  ||  Supreme Court: Criminal Courts Can Only Correct Clerical Errors, Not Review Judgments  ||  Supreme Court: Arbitration Right Remains Despite Arbitration Clause Becoming Inoperable  ||  Supreme Court: Minor Can Repudiate Guardian’s Voidable Sale by Conduct After Majority    

Clarification of India's position on the acceptance of MAP and bilateral APA in cases of countries where Article 9(2) of OECD Model Tax Commentary is absent- (Press Information Bureau) (27 Nov 2017)

MANU/PIBU/1403/2017

Direct Taxation

A number of references have been received from time to time regarding the acceptance of applications pertaining to Transfer Pricing MAP cases and Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) where the Associated Enterprise (AE) of the Indian entity is resident of a country with which India has entered into a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) but the Agreement does not contain Paragraph 2 of Article 9 (or its relevant equivalent Article) relating to 'Corresponding Adjustment'.

The matter has been examined by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and it has been decided to accept Transfer Pricing MAP and bilateral APA applications regardless of the presence or otherwise of Paragraph 2 of Article 9 (or its relevant equivalent Article) in the DTAAs.

Tags : MAP   APA   OECD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved