Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Ranthambore Nature Guide Association v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (09 Sep 2015)

Petition against appointment of additional nature guides at Ranthambore rejected

MANU/RH/1528/2015

Environment

Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition by nature guides at Ranthambore National park against the appointment of additional guides. Noting that the policy of the State in increasing the numbers of nature guides was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, no reasons were espoused requiring court interference. It further accepted submissions that the Petitioners were commercial competitors of the park and their vested interest in maintaining a monopoly in the trade rendered them devoid of locus standi before the court.

Relevant : The Nagar Rice & Flour Mills and Ors. vs. N. Teekappa Gowda & Bros. and Ors. MANU/SC/0453/1970

Tags : RANTHAMBORE   NATURE GUIDE   VESTED INTEREST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved