Supreme Court: State Cannot Acquire Temple Property Through Gift Deed  ||  Supreme Court: HC Registry Should Exclude Court Vacations When Listing Cases After Fixed Days  ||  Supreme Court Flags Stark Non-Compliance With Directions on CAPF Cadre Review  ||  Supreme Court: Internet Access and Use is a Fundamental Right, Including for Children  ||  Supreme Court: Letters Patent Bench Cannot Interfere Merely Over Errors of Fact or Law  ||  Supreme Court: Voters May File Complaints Against Candidates over False Affidavits under RP Act  ||  Madras HC: Using Children in Campaign is Inappropriate but Does Not Invalidate Election  ||  Allahabad HC: Section 69 BNS Cannot Be Invoked by Transgender Woman in False Marriage Promise Case  ||  Delhi High Court Permits Britannia’s ‘No Added Sugar, Maida or Palm Oil’ Claim on Biscuit Packs  ||  Calcutta High Court Bars Deportation of Alleged Bangladeshi Woman until CAA Application is Decided    

Ranthambore Nature Guide Association v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (09 Sep 2015)

Petition against appointment of additional nature guides at Ranthambore rejected

MANU/RH/1528/2015

Environment

Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition by nature guides at Ranthambore National park against the appointment of additional guides. Noting that the policy of the State in increasing the numbers of nature guides was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, no reasons were espoused requiring court interference. It further accepted submissions that the Petitioners were commercial competitors of the park and their vested interest in maintaining a monopoly in the trade rendered them devoid of locus standi before the court.

Relevant : The Nagar Rice & Flour Mills and Ors. vs. N. Teekappa Gowda & Bros. and Ors. MANU/SC/0453/1970

Tags : RANTHAMBORE   NATURE GUIDE   VESTED INTEREST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved