SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Ranthambore Nature Guide Association v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (09 Sep 2015)

Petition against appointment of additional nature guides at Ranthambore rejected

MANU/RH/1528/2015

Environment

Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition by nature guides at Ranthambore National park against the appointment of additional guides. Noting that the policy of the State in increasing the numbers of nature guides was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, no reasons were espoused requiring court interference. It further accepted submissions that the Petitioners were commercial competitors of the park and their vested interest in maintaining a monopoly in the trade rendered them devoid of locus standi before the court.

Relevant : The Nagar Rice & Flour Mills and Ors. vs. N. Teekappa Gowda & Bros. and Ors. MANU/SC/0453/1970

Tags : RANTHAMBORE   NATURE GUIDE   VESTED INTEREST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved