SC: No Compulsion for Companies to Give Names of All Secured/Unsecured Creditors in Balance Sheet  ||  J&K HC: Certificate of Insurance under MV Act Includes a Cover Note  ||  Kerala HC: State Must Ensure that Digital Platforms are Accessible to Everyone  ||  Guj. HC: State Bar Council to Issue Provis. Certificates to Students from Colleges Unapproved by BCI  ||  Karnataka HC: Mere Change of Counsel Cannot be a Ground to Recall Witness  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Award Compensation for Breach of Contract in Absence of Legal Injury  ||  Kar HC: Necessary for Authorities to Dispose of Application to Renew Registration in Reasonable Time  ||  Bom HC: Non-Disposal of Registration Application in 6 Months Would Not Result in Deemed Registration  ||  Delhi HC: Power Under A. 227 to be Exercised Where Failure to Correct May Result in Grave Injustice  ||  Bombay HC: Tribunal’s Award Even if Erroneous, has to be Challenged by Invoking S. 34 of A&C Act    

Ranthambore Nature Guide Association v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (09 Sep 2015)

Petition against appointment of additional nature guides at Ranthambore rejected

MANU/RH/1528/2015

Environment

Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition by nature guides at Ranthambore National park against the appointment of additional guides. Noting that the policy of the State in increasing the numbers of nature guides was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, no reasons were espoused requiring court interference. It further accepted submissions that the Petitioners were commercial competitors of the park and their vested interest in maintaining a monopoly in the trade rendered them devoid of locus standi before the court.

Relevant : The Nagar Rice & Flour Mills and Ors. vs. N. Teekappa Gowda & Bros. and Ors. MANU/SC/0453/1970

Tags : RANTHAMBORE   NATURE GUIDE   VESTED INTEREST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved