SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed  ||  SC: Properties Acquired by Karta are Presumed to be Joint Hindu Family Assets unless Proven Otherwise  ||  SC: Trial Courts Must Record that Free Legal Aid was Offered to Accused Before Witness Examination  ||  SC: State Government Employees Cannot Claim Dearness Allowance Twice a Year Unless Rules Allow  ||  P&H High Court: Anticipatory Bail on Settlement Can be Revoked if Compromise is Broken  ||  Delhi High Court: Consenting Adults can Choose Life Partners Without Societal or Parental Approval  ||  Cal HC: Excessive Palm Sweating Alone Cannot Render Candidate Medically Unfit for CAPF Appointment  ||  Del HC: Mother's Right to Education and Personal Growth Cannot be Restricted Due To Custody Disputes  ||  SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes    

Surabhi Gehlot and Ors. v. Swarn Kanta Punj - (High Court of Delhi) (18 Sep 2015)

Right to park vehicle not reasonably necessary for enjoyment of tenancy

MANU/DE/2713/2015

Tenancy

In a case where the Plaintiff had raised dispute to the Defendants’ installation of a gate that prevented her from parking her car, the Court held it irrelevant how long she had been parking her car. Having failed to satisfy the requirements of a dominant and servient heritage, the Plaintiff did not have an easementary right of way, let alone an easementary right of parking. Further, the right to park was a valuable right that, unless expressly stated in the lease, could not be assumed. The Court determined that though the right to park a car was not reasonably necessary, Plaintiff’s right to walk over the disputed land was a necessity for the enjoyment of her tenancy.

Relevant : Chapsibai Dhanjibai v. Purushottam MANU/SC/0564/1971 Jeenab Ali v. Allabuddin, MANU/WB/0185/1896 Haji Abdulla Harron v. Municipal Corporation, Karachi MANU/SN/0017/1938

Tags : TENANCY   EASEMENT   PARK   VEHICLE   NECESSARY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved