SC: UGC Regulations Override State Law on Forming Search Committees For University VC Appointments  ||  SC: State Cannot Deny Regularisation to Long-Serving Contract Staff Appointed Through Due Process  ||  Supreme Court: Patients Cannot Claim Unproven Medical Treatments as a Matter of Right  ||  SC: Polluting Company’s Turnover May Be Considered While Fixing Environmental Damage Compensation  ||  Delhi HC: Dacoity Convicts U/S 395 IPC Cannot Claim Benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act  ||  Bombay HC: An Adopted Child’s Caste is Considered the Same as That of the Adoptive Parents  ||  Calcutta High Court: 18-Month Delay in Delivering a Judgment Alone is Not Sufficient to Set it Aside  ||  Punjab & Haryana High Court: ED Can Arrest Individuals Even if FIRs are Added to the ECIR Later  ||  SC: Menstrual Health is a Fundamental Right under Article 21; Orders Free Sanitary Pads in Schools  ||  Supreme Court: Industrial Court is the Proper Forum to Decide Issues Relating to Contract Labour    

Surabhi Gehlot and Ors. v. Swarn Kanta Punj - (High Court of Delhi) (18 Sep 2015)

Right to park vehicle not reasonably necessary for enjoyment of tenancy

MANU/DE/2713/2015

Tenancy

In a case where the Plaintiff had raised dispute to the Defendants’ installation of a gate that prevented her from parking her car, the Court held it irrelevant how long she had been parking her car. Having failed to satisfy the requirements of a dominant and servient heritage, the Plaintiff did not have an easementary right of way, let alone an easementary right of parking. Further, the right to park was a valuable right that, unless expressly stated in the lease, could not be assumed. The Court determined that though the right to park a car was not reasonably necessary, Plaintiff’s right to walk over the disputed land was a necessity for the enjoyment of her tenancy.

Relevant : Chapsibai Dhanjibai v. Purushottam MANU/SC/0564/1971 Jeenab Ali v. Allabuddin, MANU/WB/0185/1896 Haji Abdulla Harron v. Municipal Corporation, Karachi MANU/SN/0017/1938

Tags : TENANCY   EASEMENT   PARK   VEHICLE   NECESSARY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved