Tel. HC: Right to Personal Liberty Includes Right to Possess Passport || Ker HC: Revisional Power of Collector Can be Exercised against AO under S.13 of Ker Building Tax Act || SC Rules in Favor of Central Government in batch of pleas challenging the Abrogation of Article 370 || Bom HC: Unpublicized Tender Condition if Permitted to be Acted Upon Amounts to Denial of Opportunity || Raj. HC: Can’t Refuse Marriage Certificate Merely Because one of the Parties is a Foreign National || Del. HC Calls for User-Friendly Handbook for Accessibility in Missing Children Cases || All. HC: Husband Not Liable for Marital Rape if Wife is 18 Years or Above || Del. HC: Obtaining of Voice Samples of Accused Must be in Compliance with Telegraph Act || P&H HC: Peaceful Protest is Not a Penal Offence Under Section 188 IPC || All HC: AO Must Consider Form 10 u/s 17 Supplied After Limitation But Before Assessment is Completed

S.N. Wadiyar v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka - (Supreme Court) (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court values excess land owned by Wadiyar royalty

MANU/SC/1044/2015

Direct Taxation

In a question on valuation of property for the purposes of wealth tax, the Supreme Court held that property, the overall area of which exceeded that allowed by the Ceiling Act, 1962, would not be valued at open market price. Vacant land that fell within the ambit of the Ceiling Act would be valued at Rs. 2 lakhs, the maximum allowable under the Act, while the remaining area would be valued at the open market price.

Relevant : Section 11 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Act Ahmed G.H. Ariff v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax MANU/SC/0167/1969

Tags : CEILING VALUATION LAND WEALTH TAX

Share :