Lok Sabha Confirms Imposition of President Rule in Manipur || AP HC: Court Possesses Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Transfer Cases on Account of Exigencies || Bom. HC: Can’t Evict Tenants Under Arbitration Act if Occupying Premises Falling under DA || Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction in Favour of ‘Peak XV Partners’ || Bombay HC: Condition that Younger Candidate Would be Preferred Over Older Candidate Violates COI || Kar. HC Refuses to Entertain Petition Seeking Implementation of Circular Regarding Usage of ‘Dalit’ || Kar. HC: Rapido, Uber Can’t Operate in State Unless Relevant Guidelines Issued || Delhi HC: Preserve CCTV Footage When Complaint against Dept. Regarding Illegal Detention in Received || SC Refuses to Direct States to Establish Public Libraries || SC: To Prevent Re-Litigation, Quasi-Judicial Bodies are Bound by Principles of Res-Judicata

S.N. Wadiyar v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka - (Supreme Court) (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court values excess land owned by Wadiyar royalty

MANU/SC/1044/2015

Direct Taxation

In a question on valuation of property for the purposes of wealth tax, the Supreme Court held that property, the overall area of which exceeded that allowed by the Ceiling Act, 1962, would not be valued at open market price. Vacant land that fell within the ambit of the Ceiling Act would be valued at Rs. 2 lakhs, the maximum allowable under the Act, while the remaining area would be valued at the open market price.

Relevant : Section 11 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Act Ahmed G.H. Ariff v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax MANU/SC/0167/1969

Tags : CEILING VALUATION LAND WEALTH TAX

Share :