Supreme Court Expresses Disappointment Over Inadequate Implementation of RPwD Act, 2016 || 24,000 Teaching and Non-Teaching Jobs Invalidated by Calcutta High Court || 24,000 Teaching and Non-Teaching Jobs Invalidated by Calcutta High Court || Del. HC: For Purposes of Article 19(6) of COI National Council for Teacher Education is ‘State’ || Karnataka High Court: Smoking Hookah as Addictive and Harmful as Smoking Cigarettes || All. HC: Interest Can’t be Awarded by Labour Court In Proc. for Money Recovery from Empl. u/s 33C(2) || All. HC: Rs. 5 Lakh Cost Imposed on CWC for Sending Minor Living With Mother to Children’s Home || Ker. HC Issues Guidelines for DNA Testing of Children of Rape Victims Who Are Given in Adoption || SC: Fourteen-Year-Old Rape Survivor Allowed to Terminate Twenty-Eight-Week Pregnancy || SC: Government of Himachal Pradesh Directed to Review its Policies on Child Care Leaves

S.N. Wadiyar v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka - (Supreme Court) (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court values excess land owned by Wadiyar royalty

MANU/SC/1044/2015

Direct Taxation

In a question on valuation of property for the purposes of wealth tax, the Supreme Court held that property, the overall area of which exceeded that allowed by the Ceiling Act, 1962, would not be valued at open market price. Vacant land that fell within the ambit of the Ceiling Act would be valued at Rs. 2 lakhs, the maximum allowable under the Act, while the remaining area would be valued at the open market price.

Relevant : Section 11 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Act Ahmed G.H. Ariff v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax MANU/SC/0167/1969

Tags : CEILING VALUATION LAND WEALTH TAX

Share :