Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry || SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts || SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs || Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks || SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers || Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income || Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction || Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy || Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report || MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC

S.N. Wadiyar v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka - (Supreme Court) (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court values excess land owned by Wadiyar royalty

MANU/SC/1044/2015

Direct Taxation

In a question on valuation of property for the purposes of wealth tax, the Supreme Court held that property, the overall area of which exceeded that allowed by the Ceiling Act, 1962, would not be valued at open market price. Vacant land that fell within the ambit of the Ceiling Act would be valued at Rs. 2 lakhs, the maximum allowable under the Act, while the remaining area would be valued at the open market price.

Relevant : Section 11 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Act Ahmed G.H. Ariff v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax MANU/SC/0167/1969

Tags : CEILING VALUATION LAND WEALTH TAX

Share :