Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions || Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award || Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience || Supreme Court: Photographing a Woman not Engaged in Private Acts Does not Constitute Voyeurism || SC Directs UPSC to Permit Scribe Changes Till Seven Days Before Exams and Review Screen-Reader Use || Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises || Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official || MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel || Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together || Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act

S.N. Wadiyar v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Karnataka - (Supreme Court) (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court values excess land owned by Wadiyar royalty

MANU/SC/1044/2015

Direct Taxation

In a question on valuation of property for the purposes of wealth tax, the Supreme Court held that property, the overall area of which exceeded that allowed by the Ceiling Act, 1962, would not be valued at open market price. Vacant land that fell within the ambit of the Ceiling Act would be valued at Rs. 2 lakhs, the maximum allowable under the Act, while the remaining area would be valued at the open market price.

Relevant : Section 11 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Act Ahmed G.H. Ariff v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax MANU/SC/0167/1969

Tags : CEILING VALUATION LAND WEALTH TAX

Share :