SC: Pre-2015 NH Act Awards Must Follow 1894 Act for Solatium and Interest  ||  SC: Service Rendered Before Regularization Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits  ||  SC: Rajpal Yadav gets Relief from Surrender in Cheque Bounce Case Subject to Rs. 5 Crore Deposit  ||  Gauhati High Court: Local NGOs Cannot Lock Homes Over Alleged Liquor Law Violations  ||  Madras High Court: Environmental, PCB Clearances Not Needed for Medical Essentiality Certificate  ||  Tripura HC: Police Report Not Contemplated By Rules Alone Cannot Be Basis to Deny Premature Release  ||  P&H HC: Senior Citizens Act cannot Remove Estranged Daughter-In-Law from Shared Home  ||  P&H HC: Foreign Licence Alone Does Not Authorize Driving in India  ||  Allahabad HC: Parental Concern Cannot Override Adult’s Choice of Life Partner  ||  Calcutta HC: Defamation Injunction Requires Truth Defence to Be Clearly Unsustainable    

Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Musi Corp. and Others - (14 Sep 2015)

Copyright holders to consider fair use before initiating DMCA takedown

Intellectual Property Rights

In case involving a takedown notification issued to an alleged infringing ‘dancing baby’ video, the United States Court of Appeal determined that Universal Music had issued notice without considering fair use. Though the court determined Universal Music to have misrepresented that it held a good faith belief that the offending activity was not fair use, it rejected the District Court’s conclusion that trial could proceed under a willful blindness theory (taking deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high probability of wrongdoing, having known critical facts). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 1998 in the United States has been at the forefront of efforts to curb copyright infringement on the internet. In recent years, firms have used its provisions to serve notices on persons sharing or uploading copyright infringing material onto the internet.

Tags : DMCA   TAKEDOWN   FAIR USE   COPYRIGHT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved