Lok Sabha Passes the Disaster Management (Amendment) Bill, 2024  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Bar Petition u/s 7 of IBC for Default Committed Prior to S.10A Period  ||  NCLAT: Secured Creditor to Pay Liquidator's Fees Under Regulations if Option u/s 52 IBC Exercised  ||  Bom. HC: Authority Processing Duty Credit Scrip Application is the Adjudicating Authority for Appeals  ||  SC: Matters Exclusively Within Jurisdiction of Statutory Authorities are Not Arbitrable  ||  SC: Wife Not Filing Complaint of Cruelty for Years Doesn’t Mean There Was No Cruelty  ||  SC: Gift Deed Conditioned Upon Rendering of Services Without Remuneration is Unconstitutional  ||  SC: Can’t Invoke Preventive Detention against Every Alleged Breach of Peace  ||  SC: Mere Allegations of Harassment Not Enough to Hold Accused Guilty of Abetment of Suicide  ||  SC: No Registration of Further Suits against Places of Worship till Further Orders    

Wilson Mathew v. The State NCT of Delhi and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (15 Sep 2015)

Security cheques to be proved as given in discharge of legally enforceable debt

MANU/DE/2691/2015

Banking

In a case involving arrest of the accused for dishonoured cheques, the Court allowed the accused’s petition. It noted the peculiar facts of the case and various contradictions in the complainant’s statements, particularly that it had accepted the postdated cheques from the accused as security. The Court held that though there was a presumption that a holder of a cheque received it in discharge of debt, the complainant had failed to establish the same.

Relevant : ICD v. Beena Shabir and Anrs. MANU/SC/0669/2002 K. Prakashan v. P.K. Surenderan MANU/SC/8009/2007 Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatreya Hegde MANU/SC/0503/2008

Tags : SECURITY   CHEQUE   PRESUMPTION   ENFORCEABLE DEBT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved