Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Krishan Lal v Champa Devi (Neutral Citation: 2024:HHC:5582) - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (22 Jul 2024)

Condition that a wife is not entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery will apply, when the matrimonial relations subsist and not after the divorce

MANU/HP/1476/2024

Family

A divorce petition filed by the Petitioner-husband was allowed on the grounds of desertion, cruelty and adultery and a decree of divorce was granted on 26.02.2007. After the passing of decree of divorce, Judicial Magistrate First Class had passed an interim order of maintenance in favour of the wife awarding ₹1,000/- per month. The revision filed by Petitioner for assailing the order was dismissed. The wife filed an application under Section 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) for enforcing the order dated 07.01.2009. The Petitioner filed an objection petition stating that the wife was living in adultery and she is not entitled to maintenance in view of Section 125(4). The learned trial court held that the interim order of maintenance was passed despite the decree of divorce. Hence, the Court is bound to execute the order unless it is varied or vacated. Hence, the present petition was filed by the husband. The issue involved in the case is that whether the divorced wife is entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery?

The court cited a judgment pronounced by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rohtash Singh vs. Ramendri and Ors., MANU/SC/0147/2000 wherein, it was held that a wife is not entitled to maintenance from her husband if she is living in adultery, she has refused to live with her husband or they are living separately by mutual consent. These conditions will apply when the matrimonial relations subsist and not after the divorce.

Thus, the court observed that, in view of the binding precedents of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the plea that a divorced wife is not entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery is not acceptable. The petition has been dismissed.

Tags : MAINTENANCE   ADULTERY   DIVORCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved