MP High Court: Estranged Husband Entitled to Loss of Consortium Compensation After Wife’s Death  ||  J&K & Ladakh HC: Claims under Roshni Act Void Ab Initio, Ownership Rights Null from Inception  ||  Madras High Court Directs Expedited Trials in 216 Pending Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs  ||  MP High Court: Allowing Minor to Drive Without Valid License Constitutes Breach of Insurance Policy  ||  Punjab & Haryana High Court: Cyber Fraud Cases Uphold Public Trust, Cannot Be Quashed by Compromise  ||  SC: Customer-Banker Relationship Based on Mutual Trust, Postmaster’s Reinstatement Quashed  ||  Supreme Court: Company Buying Software for Efficiency and Profit Is Not a ‘Consumer’ under CPA  ||  SC: Long Custody or Trial Delay Not Ground for Bail in Commercial Narcotic Cases if S.37 Unmet  ||  Calcutta HC Disqualifies Politician Mukul Roy from Assembly under Anti-Defection Law  ||  Supreme Court Bans Mining in and Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries    

Krishan Lal v Champa Devi (Neutral Citation: 2024:HHC:5582) - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (22 Jul 2024)

Condition that a wife is not entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery will apply, when the matrimonial relations subsist and not after the divorce

MANU/HP/1476/2024

Family

A divorce petition filed by the Petitioner-husband was allowed on the grounds of desertion, cruelty and adultery and a decree of divorce was granted on 26.02.2007. After the passing of decree of divorce, Judicial Magistrate First Class had passed an interim order of maintenance in favour of the wife awarding ₹1,000/- per month. The revision filed by Petitioner for assailing the order was dismissed. The wife filed an application under Section 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) for enforcing the order dated 07.01.2009. The Petitioner filed an objection petition stating that the wife was living in adultery and she is not entitled to maintenance in view of Section 125(4). The learned trial court held that the interim order of maintenance was passed despite the decree of divorce. Hence, the Court is bound to execute the order unless it is varied or vacated. Hence, the present petition was filed by the husband. The issue involved in the case is that whether the divorced wife is entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery?

The court cited a judgment pronounced by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rohtash Singh vs. Ramendri and Ors., MANU/SC/0147/2000 wherein, it was held that a wife is not entitled to maintenance from her husband if she is living in adultery, she has refused to live with her husband or they are living separately by mutual consent. These conditions will apply when the matrimonial relations subsist and not after the divorce.

Thus, the court observed that, in view of the binding precedents of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the plea that a divorced wife is not entitled to maintenance if she is living in adultery is not acceptable. The petition has been dismissed.

Tags : MAINTENANCE   ADULTERY   DIVORCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved