Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely  ||  Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction  ||  Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage  ||  Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt  ||  Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation  ||  Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims  ||  Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction  ||  Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay  ||  Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months    

Chetram Mali vs. Karishma Saini (Neutral Citation: 2023:DHC:8322-DB) - (High Court of Delhi) (21 Nov 2023)

Maintenance provisions under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 are gender neutral

MANU/DE/7763/2023

Family

Present appeal arises out of an Order passed by the learned Family Court Judge by which appellant was directed to pay the respondent a sum of ₹30,000/- per month towards maintenance pendente lite from the date of filing of the divorce petition till its disposal along with litigation expenses of ₹51,000/-.

The appellant was directed to pay a sum of ₹21,000/- per month as maintenance in the proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which was enhanced to ₹30,000/- in the proceedings under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) without any change in circumstances. The appellant who has to support his aged parents and siblings is the only earning member with a gross salary of ₹1,04,276/- and the net salary received by the appellant after deductions and recoveries is ₹56,492/-.

The respondent claims to have no independent source of income but has reasonable educational background being a graduate from Delhi University. She appears to have voluntarily undertaken social work as claimed despite there being no impediment for undertaking a meaningful employment.

Therefore, the Court observed that the spouse having a reasonable capacity of earning but who chooses to remain unemployed and idle without any sufficient explanation or indicating sincere efforts to gain employment should not be permitted to saddle the other party with one sided responsibility of meeting out the expenses. The equivalence does not have to be with mathematical precision but with the objective to provide relief to the spouse by way of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses, who is unable to maintain and support during the pendency of proceedings and to ensure that party should not suffer due to paucity of source of income. The provision is gender neutral and the provisions of Sections 24 & 25 of HMA provide for the rights, liabilities and obligations arising from marriage between the parties under HMA. Appeal disposed off.

Tags : FAMILY   MAINTENANCE   GENDER NEUTRAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved