Supreme Court: Past Ad Hoc Service Counts for Pension, Not Seniority Against Direct Recruits  ||  SC: CPC Amendment Allowed When New Facts and Reliefs Directly Relate to Existing Dispute  ||  SC: Governing Law Clause Relevant to Determine Arbitral Seat When Two Venues Are Named  ||  Supreme Court: Section 161 CrPC Statements Can Be Considered at Cognizance Stage, Not at Trial  ||  Bombay High Court Directs Release of Protesters Held over Anti-ECI Agitations  ||  Kerala High Court Orders State to Pay Rs. 21,000 Post-Surgery Assistance to Transgender Person  ||  Madras High Court: DVAC Not Entitled to Blanket RTI Exemption in Corruption Cases  ||  Karnataka High Court Strikes Down Enhanced SC/ST Quota for Breaching 50% Reservation Cap  ||  Delhi HC: First-Come, First-Served Policy for Ramleela Ground Allotment is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Automatic Revocation of Christian Wills on Marriage under S.69 Succession Act    

SC: Cannot Direct Company’s Authorized Signatory to Pay Interim Compensation - (26 Jul 2024)

BANKING

SC has stated that authorized signatories can bind company through their actions but they do not merge their legal status with that of the company. This distinction supports interpretation that drawer under Section 143A of NI Act refers specifically to issuer of cheque, not authorized signatories.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES   S. 143A OF NI ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved