SC: Submission of Maadhyamik Admit Card Along With Class X Pass Certificate For Verification  ||  SC: Compassionate Aid to Govt Employee’s Family Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation  ||  Supreme Court: Rooh Afza Taxable at 4% As Fruit Drink Under UP VAT Act  ||  Supreme Court: Document isn’t Forged Just Because it’s Not Found in Public Office Records  ||  Delhi High Court: Wards of Disabled Soldiers in Service Not Eligible For Priority-II Reservation  ||  Calcutta HC: Cruelty Claims, Late Medical Certificates Can't Justify Attempt-To-Homicide Charges  ||  Cal HC: Deity’s Title Cannot be Challenged by Adverse Possession Claims Against its Sebait/Manager  ||  Madras High Court: Every Prisoner Has the Right to Periodic Medical Checkups under Article 21  ||  Orissa High Court: Writ Courts Can’t Decide Child Custody Unless It’s Illegally Retained  ||  Supreme Court: Detailed Appreciation of Evidence is Not Allowed at the Bail Stage    

SC: Cannot Direct Company’s Authorized Signatory to Pay Interim Compensation - (26 Jul 2024)

BANKING

SC has stated that authorized signatories can bind company through their actions but they do not merge their legal status with that of the company. This distinction supports interpretation that drawer under Section 143A of NI Act refers specifically to issuer of cheque, not authorized signatories.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES   S. 143A OF NI ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved