Search Results for Tag : trade mark
Top Story
Title of religious text not ordinarily registrable as trade mark(27.10.2015)
The Supreme Court left little room for interpretation in its ruling against registration of a trade mark in ‘Ramayan’ to be used on packaging for ince.....
Tags : Trade mark, religious text , title, public juris
Blast from the Past
Trading godly good will(23.08.1967)
Being able to exploit financially intellectual property has been recognised as vital to any country’s success and prosperity. And what prosperity must.....
Tags : Trade mark, ganesh, publici juris, religious
News
Delhi HC: Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks is Industry u/s 2(j) ID Act(21.01.2020)
Delhi High Court has held that the office of a Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks is an industry under Section 2(j) of the Industr.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks
Diageo and United Spirits Settles Trademark War over Black Label(29.10.2015)
Trademark tussle between Diageo Brands BV and United Spirits' McDowell & Co Ltd over “Black Label” in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).....
Tags : Diageo , United Spirits ,Trade mark lack Label
Delhi HC: Trademark Disputes that Arises Out of Contractual Rights and Obligations are Arbitrable(06.04.2022)
Delhi High Court has held that all the disputes arising out of the Trade Marks Agreement are not outside the scope of arbitration. The Court opined th.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Trade Marks Agreement, arbitration, grant, registration, trademarks
Delhi HC: Concurrent Registration of Same or Similar Trademark Not Per Se Barred(11.04.2022)
Delhi High Court has held that if two Trade Marks are validly registered, both the registered proprietors can use the Trade Marks to the exclusivity o.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Trade Marks, exclusivity
Del HC: Evidence by Affidavit Not Required if Documentary Evidence Sufficient to Decide WellKnown TM(10.07.2023)
Delhi High Court has held that evidence by affidavit would not be mandatory, so long as there is sufficient documentary evidence to determining the we.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Documentary Evidence, Well-Known Trade Mark
Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India(25.10.2024)
Bombay High Court has held that the popular food and beverage mark 'GIRNAR' is a well know trademark in India which has surpassed the scope of merely .....
Tags : Bombay High Court, GIRNAR, Trade Mark
Judgments
Trade mark ruling eases Lupin’s pressure(23.12.2015)
Bombay High Court granted a motion in favour of Lupin Limited, maker of ‘Nebistar’ line of medicines. It determined Lupin’s registered mark and ‘Nebis.....
Tags : Trade mark, divisibility, comparison, pronunciation
Trade mark ruling eases Lupin’s pressure(23.12.2015)
Bombay High Court granted a motion in favour of Lupin Limited, maker of ‘Nebistar’ line of medicines. It determined Lupin’s registered mark and ‘Nebis.....
Tags : Trade mark, divisibility, comparison, pronunciation
Del HC: No Ex-Parte Injunction in TM Infringement Suit if Defendant Has Been in Market for Some Time(01.09.2023)
Delhi High Court has held that in trade mark (TM) infringement suits, where the mark has been used by defendant for any length of time, that sole fact.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Trade Mark Infringement, Injunction
Delhi HC to Trade Marks Registry: Process Needs to Be Streamlined(04.11.2019)
Delhi High Court has rapped Trade Marks Registry for complaints being filed against the delays caused in processing the registration applications and .....
Tags : Delhi HC, Trade Marks Registry
Delhi HC to Trade Marks Registry: Registration Process Needs to Be Streamlined(04.11.2019)
Delhi High Court has rapped Trade Marks Registry for complaints being filed against the delays caused in processing the registration applications and .....
Tags : Delhi HC, Trade Marks Registry
Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks(04.07.2025)
Delhi High Court has held that even though the concept of a 'family of marks' is not expressly mentioned under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but the same .....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Family of Marks, Trade Marks Act
Del. HC: Plea of Invalidity Essential to Challenge Validity of Mark U/S 124 of TM Act(06.11.2023)
Delhi High Court has held that for Section 124(1) of Trade Mark Act, to apply in a case where plaintiff seeks to challenge validity of the defendant’s.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Trade Mark, Validity
Del. HC: Use of TM by Ex-Licensee After Revocation of Licence Amounts to Infringement(08.11.2023)
Delhi High Court has held that once the Licence has been revoked, it is impermissible for ex-licence to use the Trade Mark (TM), and the same would am.....
Tags : Delhi High Court, Trade Mark, Infringement
Injunction granted against title phonetically similar to ‘Indian Express’(23.10.2015)
The Bombay High Court accepted arguments that the Defendant’s use of the title ‘Indian Express’ in Devnagari script for its newspaper infringed the tr.....
Tags : Indian express, title, trade mark
Havells wins trade mark battle against upcoming IPO(30.04.2016)
Havells Pvt. Ltd. trade mark infringement suit against a similarly titled company survived dismissal for lacking a fresh cause of action. The suit was.....
Tags : Havells, trade mark, ipo, disclosure
International Cases
Olympus’ ‘3D’ mark rejected(17.12.2015)
The General Court of the European Court of Justice dismissed an application by Olympus Medical Systems to register the mark, ‘3D’. The Court concurred.....
Tags : Ecj, Olympus, trade mark, 3d
Olympus’ ‘3D’ mark rejected(17.12.2015)
The General Court of the European Court of Justice G.....Tags : Coca cola, bottle, trade mark, relevant public
Chelsea still owns ‘José Mourinho’(30.05.2016)
Feel like you’re leaving a part of yourself behind when you leave your job? José Mourinho may be experiencing that a little too literally for his own .....
Tags : football, jose mourinho, trade mark
Hurtful or not, free speech is free(22.12.2015)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled Section 2(a) of the Lanham (Trademark) Act, Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved