Homebuyers Seek Review of Judgment Classifying Greater Noida Industrial Authority as Secured Cred.  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Entertain Petition u/s 7 on Basis of Guarantee Invoked During Prohibited Period  ||  NCLAT: Serving Notice on E-Mail Provided in Section 7 Petition is Sufficient Compliance  ||  NCLAT: Under Section 99 of IBC Ten-Day Time Period is Directory Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT: Court Must Adopt Lenient Approach While Condoning Delay in Refiling  ||  Delhi HC: Place Where Tormented Lady Gets Compelled to Kill Herself has No Bearing  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Direction of Single Judge Asking Wikimedia to Remove Defamatory Content of ANI  ||  Centre Notifies Effective Date of Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025  ||  SC: No Bar on Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contracts through Section 28 of Contract Act  ||  SC: MCD to Start Massive Awareness Campaign to Inform Public about Duties of Waste Generators    

Search Results for Tag : pure play

Judgments

Distinct logo cannot rescue copycat emulating overall trade dress(25.05.2016)

Delhi High Court rejected submissions by Pure Play Sports that the similarity in designs between its shoes and those of the Plaintiff Skechers was suf.....

Tags : skechers, pure play, sports shoes, trade dress, distinct, logo



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved