Supreme Court: Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ In Heated Exchange Isn’t Obscenity under IPC Section 294 || Supreme Court: Even a Single Tainted Public Work Award Violates Article 14 || Supreme Court Upholds Lease Cancellation, Denies Relief for Failure to Develop Allotted Land || Supreme Court Quashes Medical Negligence Case, Says Surgeon Best Placed To Choose Procedure || Supreme Court: Sajjadanashin of a Dargah and Mutawalli of a Waqf are Distinct Roles || Supreme Court: Criminal Proceedings Can be Quashed if Reliable Evidence Disproves Allegations || Delhi HC: Promises by CM at Press Conferences are Not Legally Enforceable Without Policy Support || Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction || Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction || J&K&L HC: Historical Books Cannot Establish Private Property Titles under Section 57 Evidence Act

Search Results for Tag : cognisance

News

Delhi HC: Taking Cognizance of FIR Against a Gang Member is Enough to Apply MCOCA(22.09.2025)

Delhi High Court clarified that the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 can be invoked if a Magistrate takes cognizance of two or more FI.....

Tags : Cognisance, FIR, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, Conviction

Judgments

Obscene acts in private place not a ‘public offence’(10.03.2016)

Obscene activities in private place not causing disturbance or disruption to others cannot be taken cognisance of by police under Section 294 of the I.....

Tags : obscene act, private place, cognisance