AP HC: App. u/s 11(6) Can Only be Maintained if Parties Fail to Refer Dispute to Arbi. Even After Not  ||  Del. HC: Father Held Guilty of Repeatedly Raping Minor Daughter for 2 Years, Acquittal Reversed  ||  SC: Reconsideration Required of the Judgement That Brought Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act  ||  SC: Person Purchasing Prop. Knowing About Appeal Pendency Can’t Claim Restit. as Bona Fide Purchaser  ||  SC: Authorities Directed to Take Immediate Measures Regarding Municipal Solid Waste in Delhi  ||  Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products  ||  Andhra Pradesh HC: Cannot Cancel Selection Process in Absence of Valid, Bonafide Reasons  ||  SC: Cannot Make Advocates Liable for Deficiency of Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986  ||  Cal HC: Not Operating in Totalitarian State, Govt. Can’t Exercise Blanket Power Over Every Instit.  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Deny Permission of Temple’s Festival on Grounds of Model Code of Conduct    

Search Results for Tag : Time-period

Judgments

When agreement is for sale of immovable property on which stamp duty is paid and the document is registered under the Registration Act, extended period of two years would be applicable(10.10.2023)

Present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 is filed challenging the order whereby refund of Rs.19,725 being the stamp d.....

Tags : Refund, Entitlement, Time-period



Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved