Supreme Court: Right to a Speedy Trial Cannot Override NDPS Act Bail Conditions  ||  SC: Relatives Cannot be Implicated in Bigamy Solely Based on Knowledge of a Second Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Service Inam Land Attached to a Mosque Constitutes Waqf Property and is Inalienable  ||  Supreme Court: Court Cannot Order an Accused to Surrender While Denying Anticipatory Bail  ||  Supreme Court: Landlord’s Legal Heirs May Amend an Eviction Suit to Include Bona Fide Need  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration Act Even After an Award  ||  Karnataka High Court: Accused Cannot be Required to Share Live GPS Location as a Condition of Bail  ||  Guj HC: Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Must Prove Readiness &Willingness to Perform Contract  ||  Madras HC: Transgenders are Children of God, Tragedy Lies in Society’s Blindness, Not Their Birth  ||  Del HC: False Educational Qualification Declaration does not amount to Corrupt Practice U/S 123(4)    

Search Results for Tag : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act

News

Supreme Court: Chief Judicial Magistrates Competent to Deal With Applications U/s 14 SARFAESI Act(24.09.2019)

In an important ruling, SC has held that a Chief Judicial Magistrate is equally competent to deal with the application moved by the secured creditor u.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, Chief Judicial Magistrate



Karnataka HC Upholds Constitutional Legality of Proviso (v) to S.14(1) SARFAESI Act(14.04.2022)

Karnataka High Court has upheld the Constitutional legality of proviso (v) Section 14(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets .....

Tags : Karnataka High Court, Constitutional legality, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002



Rajasthan HC: Magistrate Can’t Order Secured Creditor to Pay Police Expenses For Asset Possession(04.11.2025)

Raj HC has held that a Magistrate cannot require a secured creditor to deposit police expenses for taking possession of a secured asset under Section .....

Tags : Creditor, Possession, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act



Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved