Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry || J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs || Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction || Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act || Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers || Delhi HC: CCI Cannot Levy Interest Retrospectively Before Valid Service of Demand Notice || Delhi HC: VC Rules Don’t Shield PMLA Accused From Physically Appearing Before ED in Probe || SC: If Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence, Magistrate May Order FIR Registration U/S .156(3) CrPC || SC: Private Buses Can’t Operate on Inter-State Routes Overlapping Notified State Transport Routes || Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists

Search Results for Tag : Section 102(3)

News

SC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Report to Magistrate Won’t Vitiate Act of Seizure by Police(14.05.2024)

Supreme Court has observed that if there is any delay on the part of the police in submitting the seizure report to the Magistrate, such delay shall n.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Section 102(3) of CrPC, Seizure Report

Allahabad HC: Non-Reporting of Seizure U/S 102 (3) CrPC Doesn't Make Such Seizure Illegal(26.04.2022)

Allahabad High Court has ruled that non-reporting of the seizure forthwith, under Section 102(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall not ips.....

Tags : Allahabad High Court, Section 102(3), Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ipso facto, seizure