SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea || Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void || SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family || J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation || Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act || J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable || Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail || Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence || Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla || Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator

Search Results for Tag : Section 102(3)

News

SC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Report to Magistrate Won’t Vitiate Act of Seizure by Police(14.05.2024)

Supreme Court has observed that if there is any delay on the part of the police in submitting the seizure report to the Magistrate, such delay shall n.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Section 102(3) of CrPC, Seizure Report

Allahabad HC: Non-Reporting of Seizure U/S 102 (3) CrPC Doesn't Make Such Seizure Illegal(26.04.2022)

Allahabad High Court has ruled that non-reporting of the seizure forthwith, under Section 102(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall not ips.....

Tags : Allahabad High Court, Section 102(3), Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ipso facto, seizure