SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds || Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes || Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227 || SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder || Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act || Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory || Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service || Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time || Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS || Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC

Search Results for Tag : Samsung india

News

National Anti- Profiteering Authority Imposes Penalty on Samsung India(03.03.2020)

National Anti- Profiteering Authority has levied a penalty of Rs 37.85 Lakhs on Samsung India for not passing on the benefits of lower Goods and Servi.....

Tags : National Anti- Profiteering Authority, Samsung india

Del. HC: Samsung India Electronics is Not Samsung Korea’s Permanent Establishment in India(17.01.2025)

Delhi High Court has held that Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd is not exigible to tax in India as it is not a 'Permanent Establishment' of South Ko.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Samsung India, Permanent Establishment