SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat || SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules || Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy || SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay || SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution || SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff || Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates || Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail || Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act || NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense

Search Results for Tag : Rule 4(3)(d)(III) of Madhya Pradesh State Services Examination Rules

News

MP HC: State Services Exam Rule Barring Meritorious Reserved Category Candidates Discriminatory(08.04.2022)

Madhya Pradesh High Court has struck down Rule 4(3)(d)(III) of Madhya Pradesh State Services Examination Rules, 2015 that barred meritorious candidate.....

Tags : Madhya Pradesh High Court, Rule 4(3)(d)(III) of Madhya Pradesh State Services Examination Rules, 2015, meritorious candidates, reserved categories