Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes  ||  Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence  ||  Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself  ||  Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors  ||  SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes  ||  Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold  ||  SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act    

Search Results for Tag : Procedural Fairness

News

Madras HC: Being an MLA Does Not Warrant Transfer of S.138 NI Act Trial(21.08.2025)

Madras HC refused to transfer a Section 138 NI Act, 1881 trial against a sitting MLA, citing lack of evidence for bias. The Court held that transfer i.....

Tags : Madras High Court, Section 138 NI Act, Judicial Magistrate, Procedural Fairness



Delhi HC: Disclosing Elaborate Reasons for Passing Interception Orders May Affect Intelligence(14.06.2022)

Delhi High Court has held that the disclosure of elaborate reasons for interception orders would be against the modified disclosure requirements of pr.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Interception Orders, Procedural Fairness



Delhi HC: Disclosing Elaborate Reasons for Passing Interception Orders May Affect Intelligence(14.06.2022)

Delhi High Court has held that the disclosure of elaborate reasons for interception orders would be against the modified disclosure requirements of pr.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Interception Orders, Procedural Fairness



J&K and Ladakh High Court Amends Jammu and Kashmir General Rules (Civil), 1978(29.07.2025)

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has introduced amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir General Rules (Civil) of 1978 as a step towards ensuring pro.....

Tags : J&K and Ladakh, Procedural Fairness, Military Personnel



Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial(30.05.2025)

Rajasthan HC has held that procedural safeguards given under Section 3392) and 37 of POCSO Act, 2012 cannot be extended to victim who attained majorit.....

Tags : Rajasthan High Court, Child Specific, Procedural Fairness



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved