Bombay HC: Judicial Remand Extension Beyond 60 Days Without Hearing, Reasons is Illegal  ||  Telangana HC: Changing Arbitration Venue Without Consent is Legally Perversive  ||  J&K&L HC: Properly Addressed and Sent Notice Deemed Served Under General Clauses Act  ||  Jharkhand HC: Fresh Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable After Earlier Rejection under S. 482 BNSS  ||  Orissa HC: Res Judicata Principle Doesn’t Apply to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC  ||  Orissa HC: Railways Strictly Liable for Passenger’s Death After Falling From Train  ||  Del. HC: Director Not Individually Liable for Asset Transfer Without Consideration under S.276 IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: No Blanket Protection for Litigants from Counsel’s Negligence  ||  Bombay HC: Board under Mathadi Act Has No Power to Review its Own Orders  ||  Delhi HC: Father Granted Custody When Mother’s Adultery Allegation Includes Neglect    

Search Results for Tag : Procedural Fairness

News

Delhi HC: Disclosing Elaborate Reasons for Passing Interception Orders May Affect Intelligence(14.06.2022)

Delhi High Court has held that the disclosure of elaborate reasons for interception orders would be against the modified disclosure requirements of pr.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Interception Orders, Procedural Fairness



Delhi HC: Disclosing Elaborate Reasons for Passing Interception Orders May Affect Intelligence(14.06.2022)

Delhi High Court has held that the disclosure of elaborate reasons for interception orders would be against the modified disclosure requirements of pr.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Interception Orders, Procedural Fairness



J&K and Ladakh High Court Amends Jammu and Kashmir General Rules (Civil), 1978(29.07.2025)

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has introduced amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir General Rules (Civil) of 1978 as a step towards ensuring pro.....

Tags : J&K and Ladakh, Procedural Fairness, Military Personnel



Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial(30.05.2025)

Rajasthan HC has held that procedural safeguards given under Section 3392) and 37 of POCSO Act, 2012 cannot be extended to victim who attained majorit.....

Tags : Rajasthan High Court, Child Specific, Procedural Fairness



Madras HC: Being an MLA Does Not Warrant Transfer of S.138 NI Act Trial(21.08.2025)

Madras HC refused to transfer a Section 138 NI Act, 1881 trial against a sitting MLA, citing lack of evidence for bias. The Court held that transfer i.....

Tags : Madras High Court, Section 138 NI Act, Judicial Magistrate, Procedural Fairness



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved