SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea || Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void || SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family || J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation || Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act || J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable || Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail || Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence || Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla || Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator

Search Results for Tag : Market fees and Rural Development fees

Judgments

Market fees and Rural Development fees are distinct as there is no exemption from Rural Development fees mentioned in the Industrial Policy 2003, it only encompasses exemption from Market fees.(15.07.2024)

This special leave appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and orders passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court where the matter pertains to ex.....

Tags : Industrial Policy, 2003, Market fees and Rural Development fees, Exemption