Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period || Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5 || Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator || SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it || SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A) || Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed || Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed || Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict || Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award || Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9

Search Results for Tag : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act

News

MCOCA Court Convicts Abu Jundal in Aurangabad Arms Haul Case(28.07.2016)

Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) Court, Mumbai, has held Abu Jundal (a key plotter of the 26/11 terror attacks) and others, guilty i.....

Tags : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act , Abu Jundal, Aurangabad arms haul case

Delhi HC: Taking Cognizance of FIR Against a Gang Member is Enough to Apply MCOCA(22.09.2025)

Delhi High Court clarified that the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 can be invoked if a Magistrate takes cognizance of two or more FI.....

Tags : Cognisance, FIR, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, Conviction