Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof || SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required || Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt || Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment || Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution || Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty || Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act || J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry || Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act || NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another

Search Results for Tag : Layoff

News

NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority Can’t Decide Workers' Claims for Layoff Period Dues under ID Act(14.01.2025)

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that it is not within the domain of the Adjudicating Authority to decide whether the workers are entitled to claim thei.....

Tags : NCLAT New Delhi, Adjudicating Authority, Layoff Period

NCLAT: Workmen Can Claim Dues Post-Layoff If They Worked After Corporate Debtor's Notice Issuance(18.09.2025)

NCLAT New Delhi bench ruled that workmen or employees cannot claim dues for the period after a layoff unless they prove they continued working post-la.....

Tags : Workmen, Claim, Layoff, Corporate Debtor