Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it || Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm || Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service || MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide || Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled || SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate || Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence || Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies || SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka || Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227

Search Results for Tag : Comparables

Judgments

Assessee has right to challenge inclusion of comparable, even if it clears the filters(18.05.2020)

By way of the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), the Appellant (Revenue) assails the impugned order passed by .....

Tags : Comparables, Exclusion, Legality

Inclusion or exclusion of comparables per se cannot be treated as a question of law unless it is demonstrated that the Tribunal took into account irrelevant consideration(22.09.2022)

Present appeal has been filed seeking a direction for setting aside the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in with respect to .....

Tags : Comparables, Exclusion, Validity