Del. HC: Accrual of Cause of Action at a Place is not a Consideration for Determining Jurisdiction || Mad. HC to State: Prevent use of Stickers such as ‘Police’ or ‘GOI’ on Private Vehicles || Bom. HC: Magistrate Needn’t Provide Additional Reasons for Amount of Interim Compensation Awarded || Del. HC: ‘THEOBROMA’ is Free to Expand its Outlets Across the Country || Ker. HC: Detention Order Under KAPPA 2007 must be Confirmed Within 3 Months from Date of Execution || Kar. HC: Not Every False Statement Made in Court Must be Subject to Prosecution || Ker. HC: Roads are Ordinarily Deserted During Night; Likelihood of Causing Death by Accident is Less || Del. HC: Severity of Offence Can’t Disentitle Foreigner to Get Parole for Filing SLP || Cal. HC: Can’t Compound Proceedings u/s 138 NI Act at Revision Stage Without Complainant’s Consent || Bom. HC: There Should be Some Accountability Fixed on Courts in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration

Search Results for Tag : Comparables

Judgments

Assessee has right to challenge inclusion of comparable, even if it clears the filters(18.05.2020)

By way of the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), the Appellant (Revenue) assails the impugned order passed by .....

Tags : Comparables, Exclusion, Legality

Inclusion or exclusion of comparables per se cannot be treated as a question of law unless it is demonstrated that the Tribunal took into account irrelevant consideration(22.09.2022)

Present appeal has been filed seeking a direction for setting aside the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in with respect to .....

Tags : Comparables, Exclusion, Validity