SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat || SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules || Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy || SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay || SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution || SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff || Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates || Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail || Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act || NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense

Search Results for Tag : Bone Ossification Test

News

Del HC: Consider Lower Side on Margin of Error if Ossification Test Opines Victim is b/w 15-17 Yrs(17.05.2023)

Delhi High Court while referring to Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (MANU/SC/0626/2013) has held that for determining age of a child victim under PO.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, POCSO Act, Bone Ossification Test

Bom HC: Bone Ossification Test Required Only When Victim’s Age is Border Line with Majority Age(05.10.2023)

Bombay High Court while observing that the question of the ossification test comes when the girl is on the borderline, has held that the testimony of .....

Tags : Bombay High Court, Bone Ossification Test, Age