Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report || Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act || SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits || Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing || Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts || Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint || Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint || Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India || SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid || SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration

Search Results for Tag : Bone Ossification Test

News

Del HC: Consider Lower Side on Margin of Error if Ossification Test Opines Victim is b/w 15-17 Yrs(17.05.2023)

Delhi High Court while referring to Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (MANU/SC/0626/2013) has held that for determining age of a child victim under PO.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, POCSO Act, Bone Ossification Test

Bom HC: Bone Ossification Test Required Only When Victim’s Age is Border Line with Majority Age(05.10.2023)

Bombay High Court while observing that the question of the ossification test comes when the girl is on the borderline, has held that the testimony of .....

Tags : Bombay High Court, Bone Ossification Test, Age