Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend || Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay || Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act || Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father || SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel || Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias || Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained || Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based || J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC || Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation

Search Results for Tag : Bone Ossification Test

News

Del HC: Consider Lower Side on Margin of Error if Ossification Test Opines Victim is b/w 15-17 Yrs(17.05.2023)

Delhi High Court while referring to Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (MANU/SC/0626/2013) has held that for determining age of a child victim under PO.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, POCSO Act, Bone Ossification Test

Bom HC: Bone Ossification Test Required Only When Victim’s Age is Border Line with Majority Age(05.10.2023)

Bombay High Court while observing that the question of the ossification test comes when the girl is on the borderline, has held that the testimony of .....

Tags : Bombay High Court, Bone Ossification Test, Age