Bombay HC: Judicial Remand Extension Beyond 60 Days Without Hearing, Reasons is Illegal  ||  Telangana HC: Changing Arbitration Venue Without Consent is Legally Perversive  ||  J&K&L HC: Properly Addressed and Sent Notice Deemed Served Under General Clauses Act  ||  Jharkhand HC: Fresh Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable After Earlier Rejection under S. 482 BNSS  ||  Orissa HC: Res Judicata Principle Doesn’t Apply to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC  ||  Orissa HC: Railways Strictly Liable for Passenger’s Death After Falling From Train  ||  Del. HC: Director Not Individually Liable for Asset Transfer Without Consideration under S.276 IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: No Blanket Protection for Litigants from Counsel’s Negligence  ||  Bombay HC: Board under Mathadi Act Has No Power to Review its Own Orders  ||  Delhi HC: Father Granted Custody When Mother’s Adultery Allegation Includes Neglect    

Search Results for Tag : BRP

International Cases

Court is empowered to remove a BRP from office on the grounds of ‘conflict of interest or lack of independence’(21.05.2021)

In facts of present case, Oakbay Investments applied to the High Court for the removal of Messrs Knoop and Klopper as business rescue practitioners (B.....

Tags : BRPs, Conflict, Removal



Every disposition made after the commencement of the winding-up is void, unless the court had ordered otherwise(13.10.2022)

The appeal addressed the remuneration of fees of business rescue practitioners in respect of work performed after an application to convert business r.....

Tags : BRP, Payment, Validity



Directors did not have the authority to represent the company in the POCA litigation(01.12.2023)

The Appellant (the company) has been in business rescue in terms of Chapter 6 of the Companies Act, 2008. The fourth and fifth respondents on appeal w.....

Tags : BRPs, Directors, Authority



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved