Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it || Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm || Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service || MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide || Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled || SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate || Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence || Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies || SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka || Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227

Search Results for Tag : Authorized Signatory

Judgments

Authorized signatory of the company shall not be considered as a 'drawer' of cheque, and could not be directed to pay the interim compensation(24.07.2024)

The present appeals are filed challenging the judgments and orders passed by the Bombay High Court, whereby the High Court allowed the criminal applic.....

Tags : Authorized Signatory, Drawer, Interim Compensation

News

Bom. HC: Company’s Authorized Signatory Not Liable to Pay Interim Compensation U/S 143A of NI Act(10.03.2023)

Bombay High Court while observing that signatory of the cheque, authorized by the "Company", is not the drawer in terms of Section 143A of Negotiable .....

Tags : Bombay High Court, Interim Compensation, Negotiable Instruments, Authorized Signatory