Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry || J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs || Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction || Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act || Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers || Delhi HC: CCI Cannot Levy Interest Retrospectively Before Valid Service of Demand Notice || Delhi HC: VC Rules Don’t Shield PMLA Accused From Physically Appearing Before ED in Probe || SC: If Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence, Magistrate May Order FIR Registration U/S .156(3) CrPC || SC: Private Buses Can’t Operate on Inter-State Routes Overlapping Notified State Transport Routes || Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists

Search Results for Tag : Authorized Signatory

News

Bom. HC: Company’s Authorized Signatory Not Liable to Pay Interim Compensation U/S 143A of NI Act(10.03.2023)

Bombay High Court while observing that signatory of the cheque, authorized by the "Company", is not the drawer in terms of Section 143A of Negotiable .....

Tags : Bombay High Court, Interim Compensation, Negotiable Instruments, Authorized Signatory

Judgments

Authorized signatory of the company shall not be considered as a 'drawer' of cheque, and could not be directed to pay the interim compensation(24.07.2024)

The present appeals are filed challenging the judgments and orders passed by the Bombay High Court, whereby the High Court allowed the criminal applic.....

Tags : Authorized Signatory, Drawer, Interim Compensation