NCLAT: Can’t Set Aside Liquidation Order u/s 33 IBC When 3rd Party has Taken Possession of Property || NCLAT: Unless Amendment Application Filed, Authority Can’t Suo Motu Amend Date of Default || Delhi HC Directs Removal of 'Kindpan' Trademark in Petition Filed by ‘Mankind’ || J&K HC: Limitation for Challenging Award Starts after Signed Copy is Received by Party || Delhi HC: ‘High Speed’ Not Sufficient to Conclude Driver Acted in Rash and Negligent Manner || Allahabad HC: Huge Difference between Executing a Particular Document and Being a Witness || Kerala HC: Can’t Consider Co-Opted Members of Bar Council as Separate Class from Elected Members || J&K HC: Govt. Failing to Communicate Rejection of Detenue’s Representation in Time Vitiates Order || SC: Electricity Act Empowers State Commissions to Regulate Open Access Within their Respective States || SC: Limitation Begins from Date of Registration of Sale Deed that Constitutes Constructive Notice

Search Results for Tag : Adverse Remarks

News

SC to Judges: Be Cautious While Making Adverse Remarks During Live Streaming(22.03.2023)

Supreme Court while observing that remarks made during live-streaming have far reaching consequences has cautioned judges against passing adverse rema.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Adverse Remarks, Live-Streaming, Judges

NCLAT: Authority Can’t Pass Adverse Remarks against RP Performing Duties as Per CoC’s Instruction(05.12.2024)

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot pass adverse remarks against the Resolution Professional who is performing dutie.....

Tags : NCLAT New Delhi, Adverse Remarks, Committee of Creditors