Orissa HC: Merit List Not a Reservoir for Future Appointments  ||  Delhi HC: Mother's Choice & Quality of Child's Life Deciding Factors in Case of Fetal Abnormalities  ||  Ker. HC: Court in Whose Limits Employee Draws Pension Has Jurisdiction to Hear Plea for Dues  ||  SC Dismisses Plea Seeking GST Exemption for Medicines to Cure Spinal Muscular Atrophy  ||  SC to Centre: Examine Means to Improve Conditions of Persons Suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome  ||  SC to Centre: Examine Means to Improve Conditions of Persons Suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome  ||  Delhi HC to BCI: Consider Having 'Pre-Set Schedule' for All India Bar Examination  ||  Karnataka HC to State: Take Forward 'One Nation One Ration Card' Policy  ||  Sikkim HC: Can’t Reduce Sentence if Trial Court Awarded Minimum Punishment Prescribed by Statute  ||  Kerala HC: State Government Well Equipped to Decide Legality of Panchayat Decisions    

SC: Additional Accused Can’t be Impleaded After Expiry of Limitation Period U/S 142 of NI Act - (18 Nov 2022)

BANKING

Supreme Court has held that impleadment of additional accused subsequent to the filing of a cheque bounce complaint is not permissible once limitation prescribed for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act has expired.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CHEQUE BOUNCE   LIMITATION   IMPLEADMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2022 - All Rights Reserved