Supreme Court: Companies Can Face Prosecution Without Individual Officers Being Named  ||  SC: Penalties on Insolvent Developers cannot be Recovered from Homebuyers as CIRP Costs  ||  Allahabad HC: ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ Hits Sovereignty, Unlike ‘Allahu-Akbar’, ‘Jai Shri Ram’  ||  Kerala High Court: Married Woman Cannot Claim Sex Was Based Solely on Promise of Marriage  ||  Madras High Court Refuses Equal Recitation of Tamil Hymns With Sanskrit at Meenakshi Temple  ||  Delhi HC: Absence of ‘Penetration’ In Child Victim’s Testimony Not Enough to Acquit Rape Accused  ||  J&K High Court: Possession of Allegedly Anti-National Book Cannot Justify Preventive Detention  ||  Delhi High Court: DNA Evidence Proves Sexual Intercourse, Not Consent  ||  Madras High Court Upholds Appointment of District Judges as Tamil Nadu Lokayukta Secretary  ||  Allahabad High Court: IO’s Mere Apprehension Cannot Justify Withholding Seized Items    

Delhi HC: Judicial Officers Need Sensitization in Intricacies of Special Enactments - (30 May 2017)

Delhi High Court has rapped District and Sessions Judge, New Delhi & Additional Sessions Judge presiding over Special Court, over handling of Public Prosecutor’s report for extension of judicial custody of an accused under Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA).

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANIZED CRIME ACT   1999  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved