Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement  ||  Provisions of Tribunal Reforms Act 2022 Struck Down as Unconstitutional  ||  Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others    

NCLAT: Foreign Company Having No Office, Account in India Will Not Suffer in Recovering Debt - (23 May 2017)

NCLAT has rejected argument that foreign companies having no office or no account in India with any “financial institution” will suffer in recovering debt from Corporate Debtor on ground that apart from IBC, there are other provisions of recovery like suit which can be preferred by any person.

Tags : NCLAT   FOREIGN COMPANY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved