SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

Amendments in Notification No. 129/2013-Customs (N.T.) dated 11.12.2013- (Ministry of Finance ) (11 May 2017)

MANU/CUSN/0049/2017

Customs

In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following amendments in the Notification No. 129/2013-Customs (N.T.) dated 11.12.2013 published in the official Gazette of India vide S.O. 3627 (E) dated 11.12.2013.

In the said notification, in the opening paragraph for the words "the Additional Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai", the words, "the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), New Custom House, Near Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi" shall be substituted.

Tags : NOTIFICATION   AMENDMENT   WORDS   SUBSTITUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved