Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition against Chhattisgarh Tax Authorities  ||  NCLAT Partially Upholds CCI’s Decision that Google Leveraged its Dominance in Play Store Ecosystem  ||  SC: No Absolute Rule that When Investigation is at Nascent Stage, High Court Cannot Quash an Offence  ||  Delhi HC: CESTAT’s Order Interdicting GST Dept. from Invoking Extended Period of Limitation Upheld  ||  AP HC: Posting Matters to Longer Dates Defeats Purpose of Urgent Notice under O.39 R.1 CPC  ||  Delhi HC: Initiation / Expansion of Live Streaming Must be Preceded by Adequate Preparation  ||  MP HC: Centre to File Response Over Compliance of Public Awareness of POCSO Act in 2 Weeks  ||  Rajasthan HC: Decision to Close Hostel Mess Due to Covid Won’t Amount to Abolition of Post  ||  Allahabad HC: Conversion to Islam Bonafide if Individual Embraces by Own Freewill  ||  Telangana HC: Cohabitation on Pretext of False Divorce from First Wife Amounts to Rape    

Bombay High Court: No Relaxation in 2002 Triple Blast Convict’s Sentence - (11 May 2017)

Bombay High Court has ruled that convict in 2002-03? Mulund, Vile Parle and Mumbai Central? triple bomb blast case, Saquib Nachan, cannot claim relaxation in his sentence based on a period he underwent sentence in another case.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   2002 TRIPLE BLAST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved