Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration  ||  SC: No Quota Applies For Judicial Officers in District Judge Posts, Issuing Seniority Guidelines  ||  SC: Interest Rate Disputes Doesn't Fall under Public Policy to Set Aside Arbitration Awards  ||  SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue  ||  Supreme Court: TIP is Unreliable if the Witness Saw the Accused Beforehand  ||  Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement    

Supreme Court Seeks Reply from Govt. over Pension for Fast Track Court Judges - (21 Sep 2015)

Supreme Court has issued notices and sought responses from Tamil Nadu Government and Registrar of Madras High Court on a plea seeking pensionary benefits for former Fast Track Court (FTC) judges, appointed on ad-hoc basis like other retired judicial officers.

Tags : SUPREME COURT  PENSION FOR FAST TRACK COURT JUDGES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved