Del. HC Directs Dept. to Remove Demands From ITBA Portal as it Fails to Comply with ITAT's Order  ||  Cal. HC: To Prevent Arbitral Awards from Becoming Meaningless They Should be Made Real  ||  Raj HC: Cognizance Can be Taken by Sessions Court Against Accused Who Haven’t Yet Been Chargesheeted  ||  SC: In Absence of Special Court for UAPA Cases, Sessions Court Will Have Jurisdiction to Try them  ||  Del HC: Delhi Govt. Directed to Implement Immediate Measures to Optimize Med. Resources in Hospitals  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Absolve Assessee of Responsibility as Registered Person to Monitor GST Portal  ||  Del HC: Invoking Penalty Proc. Based on NFAC’s Own Failure to Lodge Claim Can’t be Sustained by them  ||  Del HC: Delhi Govt. Directed to Implement Immediate Measures to Optimize Med. Resources in Hospitals  ||  Supreme Court: Strict Penalties Required for Official Misconduct During Elections  ||  SC: Employee Getting Terminated Without Disciplinary Enquiry Violates Principles of Natural Justice    

Bombay High Court Upholds States Rule-Making Power Under Criminal Law Amendment Act 1932 - (14 Apr 2017)

Bombay High Court has examined whether State retains powers conferred by Section 10 of Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1932 to make certain offences cognizable and non-bailable, even though Criminal Procedure Code 1898 was repealed and replaced by Criminal Procedure Code 1973.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT 1932  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved