Kerala HC Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Filing Two Appeals Leading to Conflicting Verdicts  ||  Gujarat HC: Giving Probe Papers to Complainant Before Chargesheet is filed Is 'Prima Facie Dangerous'  ||  SC Quashes Army’s Gender-Biased JAG Policy as ‘Against Equality’  ||  SC to Jharkhand HC Judges: Take Leave to Clear Pending Judgments  ||  SC Stays NGT’s Rs. 50 Cr Fine on DJB & MCD Over Yamuna Pollution  ||  SC: Bar Councils Can't Collect "Optional Fees" During Enrolment  ||  Calcutta HC: In Framing Arbitration Agreement Words Used Must be Certain, Definite  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Evaluate Performance of Employee When on Sanctioned Leave During Covid  ||  Kerala HC: Public Paying Toll Fees Casts Responsibility on NHAI to Ensure Smooth Traffic  ||  Calc. HC: Writ Court Rejecting Claims Over Disputed Issues Doesn’t Bar Arbitration if Clause Exists    

Supreme Court Agrees to Decide Upon Extended Window For Note Exchange in July - (12 Apr 2017)

Supreme Court has said that it will first decide whether there is a need at all to open a window for public to exchange or deposit their demonetised currency notes post cut-off date of December 31, 2016 prescribed under Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT  DEMONETIZATION   NOTE EXCHANGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved