Supreme Court Allows Cross-Examination on Brand Use Despite Written Statement Not Being on Record  ||  Supreme Court: Enquiry Needed Before Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Antecedents  ||  Supreme Court: Trading While Holding Confidential Information Indicates Insider Trading  ||  Supreme Court Explains Four-Step Test to Quash Criminal Cases Using Defence Material  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Man in Minor Rape Case, Flags HC's Medical Evidence Lapse  ||  Bombay HC: Minor’s Inability to Describe Sexual Act No Ground to Reject Her Testimony  ||  Delhi HC: Wife’s Interim Maintenance Cannot be Based Solely on Husband’s Income  ||  Calcutta HC: SLSA Cannot Adopt ‘Big Brother’ Approach Over Adult Victims’ Compensation  ||  Allahabad HC: Further Investigation Permissible Even After Final Report is Accepted  ||  Allahabad HC: Court-Directed Award Cannot be Challenged for Not Computing Market Value    

Gammon-OJSC Mosmetrostroy JV and Ors. v. Chennai Metro Rail Limited and Ors. - (High Court of Madras) (08 Sep 2015)

CMRL’s invocation of Gammon’s guarantee would cause irretrievable injustice

MANU/TN/2876/2015

Commercial

The Madras High Court granted an injunction in favour of Gammon, preventing Chennai Metro Rail Limited from invoking its bank guarantee. CMRL’s move stemmed from Gammon’s intention to rope in an Italian firm to help complete the project within the stipulated timeframe. The Court dismissed allegations that such an act was fraudulent, noting that Gammon had faced several lengthy delays arising out of operational and approval-related causes. It viewed efforts to bring in a third-party contractor as a bona fide move to completing the project in time.

Relevant : Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. vs State of Bihar MANU/SC/0654/1999 The Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd., vs The State of Gujarat MANU/SC/0282/1974 Bishundeo Narain vs Seogeni Rai MANU/SC/0059/1951

Tags : FRAUD   GUARANTEE   METRO   INJUNCTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved