Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC  ||  Delhi HC: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 as They Do Not Perform Public Functions  ||  Delhi HC: Pending Probate Proceedings Do Not Prevent Filing FIR For Alleged Will Forgery  ||  Ker HC: Dismissal For Default Alone Cannot Justify Rejecting Restoration Plea For Lack of Vigilance  ||  SC: Disclosure Statements Alone Cannot Secure Conviction Without a Complete Chain of Evidence  ||  Supreme Court Orders Reporting of Student Suicides and Bans Denial of Classes or Exams  ||  SC: Govt Can Exclude Overqualified Candidates From Posts Requiring Lower Qualifications  ||  SC: Contracts to Hire Global Speakers For Media Summits are Not Taxable as Event Management Services  ||  SC: Mandatory Injunction Suit Alone is Not Maintainable When Plaintiff’s Title is Disputed    

Himachal Pradesh HC: Girl Voluntarily Accompanying Known Person Doesn’t Mean Consents Sex - (09 Mar 2017)

Himachal Pradesh High Court, while convicting nine persons accused of raping a girl, has observed that ‘a girl voluntarily accompanying a known person does not imply that she was a consenting party to have sexual intercourse with such person’.

Tags : HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT   RAPE   CONSENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved