NCLAT: Resolution Professional Can’t Admit Claims Based On Uninvoked Guarantee  ||  NCLAT: Upon Approval of Resolution Plan, Claims not Included in RP Stand Extinguished  ||  All. HC: Police Must Ensure that Movement of Lawyers to Court is Unhindered  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Bar Court from Entertaining more than One Application u/s 29A of A&C Act  ||  Kar. HC: Can Quash Cr. Proceedings on Basis of Witness Statements only in Rare Cases  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Transfer Probe to CBI Merely because Accused is Sitting CM  ||  Bom. HC Issues Contempt Notice against Woman Circulating Objectionable Comments against SC & HC  ||  Del. HC Upholds Validity of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013  ||  Mad. HC: Provision Preventing Arrest of Women is Directory not Mandatory  ||  Del. HC: Bald Allegations against IO Insufficient for Transferring Probe to Another Agency    

Delhi Court Sentences Man to 10 Year Jail Term, Acquits Two Other in 2005 Delhi Blast Case - (17 Feb 2017)

A Delhi based Court has sentenced a man to 10 years in jail for Delhi’s worst terrorist attack and freed two others, triggering allegations that police botched up investigation into serial blasts that killed 67 people and injured 200.

Tags : DELHI COURT   2005 DELHI BLAST CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved