Delhi High Court Permits Minor Rape Survivor to Terminate Pregnancy  ||  HP HC: Employees Having Good Political Relation and Influence are Hardly Sent to Hard/Tribal Area  ||  Delhi HC Stays Single Judge Rusling Asking Amazon to Pay ?339.25 Crore to 'Beverly Hills Polo Club'  ||  Gauhati HC: PIL Challenges Assam Government’s Push Back Policy  ||  Cal HC to State: Why Candidates Tainted with Scam being Given Opportunity to Reapply for Recruitment  ||  Telangana HC: Appointment of Arbitrator by One Party after Due Notice Cannot be Challenged  ||  BCI Issues Advisory Cautioning About Unauthorised LL.M Programmes  ||  Trademark Registry Approves M.S Dhoni’s Application to Officially Register ‘Captain Cool’ Trademark  ||  Delhi HC: Meta Directed to Remove Obscene Photos of Minor Girl  ||  Cal. HC: To Convict Person u/s 304B of IPC, Conclusive Proof of Cruelty before Death Required    

Karnataka HC Quashes Rule 8(1) of Mineral Concession Rules, 2006 - (05 Dec 2016)

Karnataka High Court has quashed Rule 8(1) of Minerals (other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, pertaining to limitation it imposes on ‘minerals not specified in First Schedule of Act’.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   MINERAL CONCESSION RULES   2006   RULE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved