Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement  ||  Provisions of Tribunal Reforms Act 2022 Struck Down as Unconstitutional  ||  Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others    

Madras High Court Denies Relief to Helios and Matheson - (31 Aug 2015)

Madras HC has dismissed plea filed by M/s Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd. seeking to quash FIR against it, contending that Economic Offences Wing of State police had no authority to investigate under TN Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act,1997.

Tags : MADRAS HC   M/S HELIOS AND MATHESON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD.  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved