Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

SC: Exporters with Pending Applications Prior to Rule 96(10) Omission Entitled to IGST Refund - (11 Aug 2026)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Supreme Court has ruled that exporters with pending IGST refund applications when Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules was omitted in 2024 can claim refunds without restrictions, settling the controversy over the rule’s removal without a saving clause.

Tags : EXPORTER; IGST REFUND; APPLICATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved