Supreme Court Explains that Comprehensive Motor Insurance Covers Occupants of a Vehicle  ||  Supreme Court: Judgments Operate Retrospectively Unless Made Prospective  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Principles Governing Witness Recall under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC  ||  Gujarat High Court: Res Judicata Prevents Trustees from Reopening Trust Property Disputes  ||  Allahabad HC: Trial Courts Cannot Examine Witnesses to Generate Fresh Evidence Before Cognizance  ||  Rajasthan HC: Funds Collected From an Illegal Toll Plaza Must Be Used For Tree Plantation  ||  Delhi HC: Minor’s Signature Alone Cannot Establish Consent for Pregnancy Termination  ||  Karnataka HC Allows ECIR Challenge under Article 226, Rejects ED’s Immunity Claim  ||  Allahabad High Court Upholds Transfer of a Dissolved Society's Assets to its Successor Company  ||  P&H HC: Cheque Bounce Cases Remain Compoundable Even After Appellate Courts Uphold Conviction    

Bombay HC Criticises ITAT for Delays in Pronouncing Orders Beyond 90-Day Limit - (04 Aug 2026)

DIRECT TAXATION

Bombay High Court criticised the ITAT for repeatedly delaying order pronouncements beyond the 90-day limit under Rule 34 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, and directed all benches to strictly comply with the prescribed deadline.

Tags : ORDERS; INCOME TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES; DEADLINE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved