SC: Recoveries U/S 27 of Evidence Act Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction; 1988 Murder Acquittal Restored  ||  SC: Successive Impleadment Applications are Barred by Res Judicata under Different CPC Provisions  ||  Supreme Court Halts Coercive Measures in CJP Protest Cases, Directs Release of Minors  ||  Supreme Court: National Commission for Scheduled Castes Lacks Power to Pass Binding Orders  ||  Bombay HC: Alleged Illegal Arrest Alone Cannot Trigger Contempt Action Against Police  ||  Bombay HC Quashes Order against Taiwan National, Says Online Study Didn't Breach Visa Rules  ||  P&H High Court Issues Directions on LADC Scheme After Reviewing Lawyers' Objections  ||  Allahabad HC: Suspension of Sentence Plea Need Not Take Priority if Appeal is Ready  ||  Allahabad High Court: Surcharge Recovery From Pradhan Must Follow Panchayat Raj Act Procedure  ||  Allahabad HC Directs IB Probe into 4 Lucknow Lawyers, Raises Concern over Lawyer-Police Nexus    

J&K&L High Court: Limitation Must be Decided Before Hearing Appeal Against 31-Year-Old Mutation - (27 Jul 2026)

LIMITATION

J&K and Ladakh High Court held that a revenue appellate authority must first decide whether a delayed appeal is maintainable before examining its merits, ruling that entertaining and allowing an appeal against a 1959 mutation after 31 years without deciding limitation was a jurisdictional error.

Tags : LIMITATION; REVENUE APPELLATE AUTHORITY; MUTATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved