Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

J&K&L High Court: Limitation Must be Decided Before Hearing Appeal Against 31-Year-Old Mutation - (27 Jul 2026)

LIMITATION

J&K and Ladakh High Court held that a revenue appellate authority must first decide whether a delayed appeal is maintainable before examining its merits, ruling that entertaining and allowing an appeal against a 1959 mutation after 31 years without deciding limitation was a jurisdictional error.

Tags : LIMITATION; REVENUE APPELLATE AUTHORITY; MUTATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved