Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction - (20 Jul 2026)

CIVIL

Supreme Court held that High Courts cannot use certiorari jurisdiction under Article 226 to reassess evidence or revisit factual findings of subordinate courts, as the writ is intended only to correct jurisdictional errors and not to function as an appellate forum.

Tags : CERTIORARI; JURISDICTION; EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved