Supreme Court: State Cannot Acquire Temple Property Through Gift Deed  ||  Supreme Court: HC Registry Should Exclude Court Vacations When Listing Cases After Fixed Days  ||  Supreme Court Flags Stark Non-Compliance With Directions on CAPF Cadre Review  ||  Supreme Court: Internet Access and Use is a Fundamental Right, Including for Children  ||  Supreme Court: Letters Patent Bench Cannot Interfere Merely Over Errors of Fact or Law  ||  Supreme Court: Voters May File Complaints Against Candidates over False Affidavits under RP Act  ||  Madras HC: Using Children in Campaign is Inappropriate but Does Not Invalidate Election  ||  Allahabad HC: Section 69 BNS Cannot Be Invoked by Transgender Woman in False Marriage Promise Case  ||  Delhi High Court Permits Britannia’s ‘No Added Sugar, Maida or Palm Oil’ Claim on Biscuit Packs  ||  Calcutta High Court Bars Deportation of Alleged Bangladeshi Woman until CAA Application is Decided    

Madras HC: Intimate Relationship Doesn't Establish Consent if Woman Was Deceived or Blackmailed - (16 Jul 2026)

CRIMINAL

Madras High Court held that an intimate relationship cannot be treated as proof of consent where a woman's participation is secured through deception, coercion, intimidation or blackmail, and while upholding the man's conviction, affirmed his imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life.

Tags : INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP; CONSENT; WOMAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved