Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action  ||  Delhi High Court: January 1 as Deemed Service Date For Delhi and Andaman Civil and Police Officers  ||  Delhi High Court: Private Media Houses Performing Public Functions are Subject to Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Rajasthan High Court Orders Registration of Pets That May Pose a Threat to Human Life  ||  Delhi High Court: NSE Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act  ||  Bombay High Court: Sikh Exemption From Helmet Rule is a Reasonable Classification under Article 14  ||  Supreme Court: Advocate Cannot Enter a Compromise Without the Client’s Authorisation  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Must Protect Every Accused From Mob Violence  ||  Supreme Court: Gujarat Municipal Election Candidates Must Disclose Their Spouses’ Assets    

Supreme Court: Advocate Cannot Enter a Compromise Without the Client’s Authorisation - (02 Jul 2026)

CIVIL

Supreme Court held that an advocate cannot enter into a compromise on behalf of a client without express authorisation. It further stated that under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, a valid compromise decree requires a settlement signed by all parties to the dispute.

Tags : COMPROMISE; CLIENT’S AUTHORISATION ; ADVOCATE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved