Supreme Court Upholds the Constitutionality of Life Sentences Without Remission Until Natural Death  ||  Supreme Court: Service Benefits Can't be Refused Due to Missing ACRs Not Attributable to Employees  ||  Supreme Court: Courts May Grant Lesser Relief under Order VII Rule 7 CPC, But Not a Different Claim  ||  Supreme Court Dismisses Lokpal's Plea Against Delhi HC Order Quashing Probe into Defence Secretary  ||  SC Grants Bail to Two UAPA Accused, Citing 12-Year Incarceration and Violation of Article 21  ||  Madras High Court: Seeking Divorce over Wife's Accidental Hip Injury is Inhumane  ||  Kerala High Court Directs Stronger Audit and Financial Oversight in Guruvayur Devaswom  ||  Madras High Court Directs State and Judiciary to Expedite Rape and POCSO Trials  ||  Karnataka HC Upholds RTO's Power to Cancel Registration Secured by False Documents  ||  Karnataka HC: Bengaluru-Mysuru Corridor Could be Biggest Scam, Farmers Deprived of Land    

Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly - (12 Jun 2026)

BANKING

Kerala High Court has held that in cheque dishonour cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, statutory presumptions in favour of the complainant arise only after they first prove the underlying transaction and execution of the cheque with clear and competent evidence.

Tags : COMPLAINANT; TRANSACTION; NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved